Skip to content
Leadee
Not translated yet.This page is not available in Italiano yet, so you are reading the English version.Open the English page
A site engineer in a hard hat reading a tablet
Netbase JSC's own site, measured by Leadee · Baseline

SoftWSP: Named by Brand, Invisible on the Buying Questions That Matter

By the Leadee team at Netbase JSC · Updated

SoftWSP shows the same pattern as Netbase JSC itself: named in 24% of all US questions (12 of 50), but only when the question already says "SoftWSP" — 0% of 38 unbranded firmware-security questions (SBOM, CRA, PSIRT, OT inventory) named it. AI recommends Finite State, Binarly and Cybellum instead, citing binarly.io and finitestate.io most. In Germany the rate is 0 of 12; the sources cited there are mostly official EU and German-language sources (bsi.bund.de, digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu). The site's GEO audit scores A (86.7), but has little to no schema.org markup and a homepage citability of just 0.15. This is a baseline; Netbase has not yet shipped the fix plan below.

About this measurement

Netbase JSC owns SoftWSP. This page is Netbase measuring its own site with its own product, not an independent audit.

This is a baseline measurement, not a result. Netbase JSC's own sites have not shipped the fix plan below yet — the earliest honest re-measurement is about four weeks after each site does, using the same prompts and engines. Nothing on this page claims an improvement.

Period
2026-W43
Change
CHG-20261025-LDE01
ICP
Device makers (firmware & OT security)
  • Perplexity sonar: n=3 per prompt, full sample
  • Google AI Mode (via DataForSEO): n=3 per prompt, full sample
  • OpenAI gpt-5 + web search: only 2 runs reached SoftWSP — the whole dogfood round stopped at 25 runs across all 7 sites because the OpenAI account ran out of credit

Headline numbers

Mentioned, all US questions
24% (12/50)
Mentioned, unbranded US questions
0% (0/38)
Domain cited, US
20% (10/50)
GEO audit grade
A (86.7)

Scope of this measurement

Markets, prompts, runs and real cost of this measurement
MarketBuyer questionsRunsReal cost
US850$0.379
DE412$0.069

AI visibility by market

Mention rate and citation rate with 95% Wilson confidence intervals.

AI visibility by market: mention rate, unbranded mention rate, citation rate, average position and share of voice
MarketMentioned, all questionsMentioned, unbranded questionsCited (domain)Avg. positionShare of voice
US24% (12/50; CI 14–37%)0% (0/38; CI 0–9%)20% (10/50; CI 11–33%)2.6715%
DE0% (0/12; CI 0–24%)0% (0/12; CI 0–24%)0% (0/12; CI 0–24%)—0%
Mention and citation counts by engine and market
MarketEngineMentionedCited
USGoogle AI Mode (DataForSEO)6/246/24
USOpenAI gpt-5 + web search0/20/2
USPerplexity sonar6/244/24
DEPerplexity sonar0/120/12

Share of voice vs named market players

Share of voice against named market players, by market
BrandUSDE
SoftWSP (this site)15% (12/50)0% (0/12)
Finite State27% (22/50)36% (5/12)
Cybellum21% (17/50)21% (3/12)
Binarly22% (18/50)21% (3/12)
NetRise12% (10/50)21% (3/12)
Nozomi Networks4% (3/50)0% (0/12)

Who AI cites instead

US — most-cited domains

  • binarly.io (62)
  • finitestate.io (59)
  • softwsp.com (39)
  • netrise.io (32)
  • cybellum.com (25)
  • github.com (24)
  • craevidence.com (18)
  • first.org (18)
  • cybersectools.com (15)
  • f6s.com (15)

DE — most-cited domains

  • craci.com (18)
  • digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu (12)
  • binarly.io (10)
  • bsi.bund.de (8)
  • proofnet.de (7)
  • advisori.de (5)
  • onekey.com (5)
  • cybersectools.com (4)
  • learn.microsoft.com (4)
  • github.com (4)

GEO audit: grade A (86.7)

  • HighLittle or no schema.org entity markup — needs Organization or LocalBusiness JSON-LD with name, url, logo, sameAs and a contact point.
  • MediumSome citability signals present; needs FAQ sections, specific numbers and a clearer opening answer paragraph (homepage citability 0.15).

What AI actually said

Google AI Mode (DataForSEO) — prompt: “is SoftWSP a credible firmware security vendor for small device makers”

SoftWSP is a small, emerging AI-native entity positioning itself around firmware analysis and industrial software security, targeting device makers navigating compliance frameworks like those in the EU, UK…

Google AI Mode (DataForSEO) — prompt: “is SoftWSP a credible firmware security vendor for small device makers”

SoftWSP is a niche, early-stage brand operated by Netbase JSC (Netbase Enterprise Solutions and Applications Joint Stock Company), an IT and software development/outsourcing firm based in Hanoi, Vietnam…

What we will change

Add schema.org Organization + Service markup

1 week

Cover firmware SBOM, PSIRT intake and OT Snapshot services, plus FAQPage; open the homepage with a direct answer with numbers (24–72h OT snapshot, free first report).

Answer the CRA questions AI is sourcing elsewhere

2 weeks

"CRA compliance checklist for connected device makers" and "how to generate an SBOM for embedded firmware for the CRA" — AI currently cites craevidence.com and first.org for these.

Publish a comparison page

next

"SoftWSP vs Finite State / Binarly / NetRise" (scope, price, audience) and "Finite State alternatives."

Publish a German-language CRA page

next

Cover the EU Machinery Regulation/CRA with a BSI citation, and seek inclusion on German-language CRA vendor lists.

Add update dates

later

7 of 15 pages have no visible update date.

Questions

Why does SoftWSP score 0% on unbranded firmware-security questions despite a GEO audit grade of A?

The audit measures crawlability and technical GEO signals, which are strong. But SoftWSP has little schema.org markup and low page citability (0.15 on the homepage), and AI answers for SBOM/CRA/PSIRT questions are built from binarly.io and finitestate.io instead — SoftWSP does not yet have a direct-answer page for those specific questions.

Is this an independent audit of SoftWSP?

No. Netbase JSC owns SoftWSP, and this measurement was run by Netbase using its own Leadee product. See "Conflict of interest" above.

When will SoftWSP be re-measured?

About four weeks after SoftWSP ships the fix plan above, using the same 12 prompts (8 US, 4 DE) and the same engines, so the before/after comparison is statistically meaningful.

Can GEO guarantee results?

No. AI answer engines change their output frequently, and no vendor — including Leadee — can guarantee a ranking or a mention. Leadee publishes confidence intervals on every metric so you can see how much a result can vary run to run.

How does Leadee measure AI visibility?

Leadee runs your prompt set against each AI engine on a weekly to daily schedule, depending on plan, through official vendor APIs (OpenAI, Gemini, Perplexity, Anthropic, DataForSEO) — never by scraping consumer chat interfaces — and reports mention rate, citation rate, average position, share of voice and sentiment with a 95% confidence interval.

Who do I talk to?

Email [email protected] or use Talk to an expert at https://leadee.ai/contact-sales — the Netbase JSC team behind Leadee replies by email or WhatsApp — or WhatsApp the CEO directly at https://wa.me/84937869689.

See where your own site stands

Run a free AI visibility scan on your own domain — the same kind of check Leadee ran on SoftWSP.