Skip to content
Leadee
An online shop owner working on a laptop among cardboard cartons
Netbase JSC's own site, measured by Leadee · Baseline

CMSmart: Best AI Visibility in the Portfolio, Held Back by Old Content

By the Leadee team at Netbase JSC · Updated

CMSmart has the best AI presence of the 7 Netbase sites measured: named in 46% of all US questions (24 of 52) and 32% of unbranded US questions (13 of 40), average position 2.5. cmsmart.net is the most-cited domain in its niche (96 citations), ahead of woocommerce.com (89). Market players Fancy Product Designer, Lumise and Zakeke are still named more. In the UK the rate drops to 9% (2 of 22). The weakest pages are old /community posts from 2020-2021, which drag down citability even though cmsmart.net itself is heavily cited. This is a baseline; Netbase has not yet shipped the fix plan below.

About this measurement

Netbase JSC owns CMSmart. This page is Netbase measuring its own site with its own product, not an independent audit.

This is a baseline measurement, not a result. Netbase JSC's own sites have not shipped the fix plan below yet — the earliest honest re-measurement is about four weeks after each site does, using the same prompts and engines. Nothing on this page claims an improvement.

Period
2026-W43
Change
CHG-20261025-LDE01
ICP
Print suppliers (web-to-print e-commerce plugin)
  • Perplexity sonar: n=3 per prompt, full sample
  • Google AI Mode (via DataForSEO): n=3 per prompt, full sample
  • OpenAI gpt-5 + web search: only 5 runs reached CMSmart — the whole dogfood round stopped at 25 runs across all 7 sites because the OpenAI account ran out of credit

Headline numbers

Mentioned, all US questions
46% (24/52)
Mentioned, unbranded US questions
32% (13/40)
Domain cited, US
44% (23/52)
GEO audit grade
A (86.8)

Scope of this measurement

Markets, prompts, runs and real cost of this measurement
MarketBuyer questionsRunsReal cost
US852$0.490
GB422$0.165

AI visibility by market

Mention rate and citation rate with 95% Wilson confidence intervals.

AI visibility by market: mention rate, unbranded mention rate, citation rate, average position and share of voice
MarketMentioned, all questionsMentioned, unbranded questionsCited (domain)Avg. positionShare of voice
US46% (24/52; CI 33–60%)32% (13/40; CI 20–48%)44% (23/52; CI 32–58%)2.517%
GB9% (2/22; CI 2–28%)9% (2/22; CI 2–28%)9% (2/22; CI 2–28%)—4%
Mention and citation counts by engine and market
MarketEngineMentionedCited
USGoogle AI Mode (DataForSEO)8/247/24
USOpenAI gpt-5 + web search3/43/4
USPerplexity sonar13/2413/24
GBGoogle AI Mode (DataForSEO)1/91/9
GBOpenAI gpt-5 + web search0/10/1
GBPerplexity sonar1/121/12

Share of voice vs named market players

Share of voice against named market players, by market
BrandUSGB
CMSmart (this site)17% (24/52)4% (2/22)
Fancy Product Designer28% (39/52)27% (12/22)
Lumise20% (27/52)27% (12/22)
Zakeke20% (28/52)23% (10/22)
YITH1% (2/52)0% (0/22)
Printful13% (18/52)18% (8/22)

Who AI cites instead

US — most-cited domains

  • cmsmart.net (96)
  • woocommerce.com (89)
  • fancyproductdesigner.com (36)
  • zakeke.com (35)
  • wordpress.com (35)
  • wordpress.org (30)
  • youtube.com (29)
  • barn2.com (20)
  • chamevo.com (17)
  • lumise.com (17)

GB — most-cited domains

  • woocommerce.com (41)
  • zakeke.com (16)
  • lumise.com (15)
  • fancyproductdesigner.com (14)
  • barn2.com (12)
  • atomicsmash.co.uk (10)
  • chamevo.com (9)
  • wordpress.com (9)
  • kanukadigital.com (7)
  • youtube.com (7)

GEO audit: grade A (86.8)

  • MediumAI training bots are blocked while search bots are allowed — a valid policy choice, but worth confirming per-bot intent in robots.txt.
  • Highllms.txt exists but has format problems (malformed link lines under 'Key facts').
  • MediumSome citability signals present; needs FAQ sections, specific numbers and a clearer opening answer paragraph.

What AI actually said

Google AI Mode (DataForSEO) — prompt: “Fancy Product Designer alternatives for WooCommerce”

(processes production files server-side) — NBDesigner (by CMSMART): Best For: Complex web-to-print ecosystems (business cards, marketing materials, custom apparel)…

Google AI Mode (DataForSEO) — prompt: “best WooCommerce web-to-print plugin for business cards and small print shops”

The Cmsmart Product Designer (NBDesigner) and Printcart Store are widely regarded as the top WooCommerce web-to-print plugins tailored specifically for small print shops and commercial stationery producers…

What we will change

Refresh or merge the old /community posts

2 weeks

Posts titled with 2020–2021 in them need a 2026 rewrite with an update date — AI already cites cmsmart.net heavily, and old content undercuts its credibility.

Publish a comparison page

next

"NBDesigner vs Fancy Product Designer vs Lumise (2026)" with a feature and pricing table, to defend position against the two closest market players.

Add UK-specific content

next

A page or case study for UK WooCommerce stores, and a presence on barn2.com and atomicsmash.co.uk, the UK-cited sources.

Answer two underserved prompts directly

next

"WooCommerce B2B ordering portal" and "migrate to WooCommerce + ERP/CRM" with a direct-answer service page.

Fix llms.txt formatting

later

The 'Key facts' section link lines need the standard format.

Questions

Why does CMSmart still lose share of voice to market players despite being the most-cited domain?

Being the most-cited domain measures off-site reach, not head-to-head comparison answers — Fancy Product Designer, Lumise and Zakeke are still named more often in direct "vs" and "alternatives" prompts, where CMSmart does not yet have a comparison page of its own.

Is this an independent audit of CMSmart?

No. Netbase JSC owns CMSmart, and this measurement was run by Netbase using its own Leadee product. See "Conflict of interest" above.

When will CMSmart be re-measured?

About four weeks after CMSmart ships the fix plan above, using the same 12 prompts (8 US, 4 UK) and the same engines, so the before/after comparison is statistically meaningful.

Can GEO guarantee results?

No. AI answer engines change their output frequently, and no vendor — including Leadee — can guarantee a ranking or a mention. Leadee publishes confidence intervals on every metric so you can see how much a result can vary run to run.

How does Leadee measure AI visibility?

Leadee runs your prompt set against each AI engine on a weekly to daily schedule, depending on plan, through official vendor APIs (OpenAI, Gemini, Perplexity, Anthropic, DataForSEO) — never by scraping consumer chat interfaces — and reports mention rate, citation rate, average position, share of voice and sentiment with a 95% confidence interval.

Who do I talk to?

Email [email protected] or use Talk to an expert at https://leadee.ai/contact-sales — the Netbase JSC team behind Leadee replies by email or WhatsApp — or WhatsApp the CEO directly at https://wa.me/84937869689.

See where your own site stands

Run a free AI visibility scan on your own domain — the same kind of check Leadee ran on CMSmart.